Audit Scope
A clear map of what an engagement covers before we open your grant ledger.
Why this page exists
Agricultural grant accounting reviews succeed when everyone agrees on boundaries: which scheme, which year, which records, and which questions the findings letter will answer. This page is that map.
Stages of a flagship audit
1. Scoping
We confirm the grant award terms, claim calendar, and whether matching funds apply. You receive a document checklist and a fee quote.
2. Evidence intake
Ledgers, bank statements, vouchers, and claim application exports arrive in a shared folder or on-site box. We log gaps before fieldwork starts.
3. Fieldwork & sampling
High-value and high-risk lines are tested against eligibility rules. Portal or application analytics flag duplicates and seasonal drift where exports exist.
4. Findings & close
A draft findings letter is reviewed with your finance lead. The final pack includes adjustments, limitations, and practical next steps for the following claim window.
Evidence we usually need
Grant award letter, approved budget, claim submissions, grant-account bank statements, supplier invoices, payroll allocations tied to the grant, and prior agency correspondence.
What “app analytics” means here
When claim histories live in portals or spreadsheet applications, we analyse those submission patterns — coding consistency, duplicate identifiers, and unusual spikes — as part of the financial audit application, not as a separate software product.
Ready to define your scope?
Browse engagements or request a review with your scheme name and program year.